domingo, septiembre 21, 2014

Replacing the Science of EcoNoMics with the System Profession of EcoIsOurs

Fourth update. Thought hypothesis.
“I spiritize, therefore I am.” – José Antonio Vanderhorst Silverio 




We reinterpret the must read very timely New York Times article From Hands to Heads to Hearts, by Thomas L. Friedman,  of January 4, 2017. In his article, Friedman distills wisdom from his “teacher and friend Dov Seidman, C.E.O. of LRN, which advises companies on leadership and how to build ethical cultures, for his take.”

The hypothesis is mainly supported by Danah Zohar and Ian Marshall must read book “Spiritual Capital.” Zohar and Marshall define Spiritual Intelligence as that “with which we access our deepest meanings, values, purposes, and highest motivations.”

Given the above, we are able to say that “the agricultural economy that ‘was about leading with hands.’ And “the industrial, which can now be reinterpreted as the knowledge economy ‘was about leading with heads’” driven by Cartesian and Kantian thinking logic. That kind of EcoNoMic logic gave us Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations. Those two economies correspond to Alvin Toffler First and Second waves.

The systemic EcoIsOurs of The Wealth of Globalization or Third Wave will then be led by the human spirit, under Peircian (after the philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce) normative sciences of logic, ethics and aesthetics.

Below there are a few quotes from Friedman's opinion that complement the above:
Software has started writing poetry, sports stories and business news. IBM’s Watson is co-writing pop hits. Uber has begun deploying self-driving taxis on real city streets and, last month, Amazon delivered its first package by drone to a customer in rural England.
Add it all up and you quickly realize that Donald Trump’s election isn’t the only thing disrupting society today. The far more profound disruption is happening in the workplace and in the economy at large, as the relentless march of technology has brought us to a point where machines and software are not just outworking us but starting to outthink us in more and more realms.
In short: If machines can compete with people in thinking, what makes us humans unique? And what will enable us to continue to create social and economic value? The answer, said Seidman, is the one thing machines will never have: “a heart.” 
“It will be all the things that the heart can do,” he explained. “Humans can love, they can have compassion, they can dream. While humans can act from fear and anger, and be harmful, at their most elevated, they can inspire and be virtuous. And while machines can reliably interoperate, humans, uniquely, can build deep relationships of trust.”
Third update Coda: As the UK and the US voters were not aware of The Wealth of Globalization (for #GlobalDebout) scenario, should European Union (#EuropeIN #15M) voters become aware of it? Both economics and politics need a big shift available here. A "wait and see" stand as Eamonn Kelly suggested as wrong without a single scenario is now clarified to be available under The Wealth of Globalization scenario. More than prosuming, producing is set to explode under the Direct Democracy of Systemic Markets in the demand side is what changes tangible hardware first innovation oriented under The Wealth of Nations to intangible software first innovations for The Wealth of Globalization. The latter institutional innovations are beyond the edges of the former of the emerging countries by including the transformation of today's impoverished rural areas into enters of advanced, highly productive enterprise. As The Wealth of Nations have led to the myopia of the industrial civilization 'Groupthink,' most countries constitutions have become anti-systemic the case for systemic constitutions is overdue for minimalist institutions all the way to global governance using heuristic system architecting policy design.

Third update. Can this primer on The Wealth of Globalization be important for the future of humanity? Please consider the post A Systemic Civilization Global Declaration of Interdependence and its eleven updates as integral to this post. In its 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th updates, that followed the "Seventh update. Global Debout proposal to create Systemic Civilization solves Big Problems," is where we introduced The Wealth of Globalization concept that's further refined next.


In a tweet conversation initiated by Winfried Felser, we identify the book Revolutionary Wealth‏ by Alvin and Heidi Toffler as the support for the emergence of The Wealth of Globalization. Such support complement our findings.

The key reason why Revolutionary Wealth could not be identified as The Wealth of Globalization in that book, can be seen in what the Tofflers say "At issue, of course, is the most misunderstood, misleading,  and misused term in the entire economic lexicon; Globalization." Next they add "Does it still have a future?" Let's see what Eamonn Kelly. the author of 'Emergence' scenario that supports The Wealth of Globalization said in March 2014, in the introduction of Deloitte’s report “Business Trends 2014: Navigating the next wave of globalization:”

It explores nine trends that are currently reshaping the business environment, driven by long-term, potentially irreversible, shifts in the global economy. These nine trends will remain highly relevant for years to come and deserve companies’ strategic attention. The winners in this new age will be inspired by new consumers with new needs, enabled by new collaboration models, and guided by new leadership with a focus on the future.

After introducing “clear indications of uncertainty and possible disruption ahead,” Kelly says that:

… it would be foolish indeed to predict a single scenario for the future of the global economy. Yet business leaders must continue to act with conviction, even in an era of growing complexity and disruption. The opportunities and challenges are too great to adopt a “wait and see” stance. The purpose of this report is to inform such action through the identification of important and robust trends that will certainly matter for years to come—in all but the most extremely catastrophic scenarios for the future of globalization.

To predict the single scenario of The Wealth of Globalization and the urgent need to create the systemic civilization of interdependent countries, we suggest that those trends are unduly influenced by the industrial civilization ‘Groupthink’ of The Wealth on Nations. To support that suggestion, the report centers on the importance of urban over rural life, and on emerging nations versus developing ones.  

In fact, lets take and address a few other quotes of Revolutionay Wealth to integrate it with our ideas to help clarify the idea of The Wealth of Globalization. There is doubt found in chapters 12, "An Unready World," where we have that: "We are... globalizing our vices more quickly than we're globalizing our virtues." In particular, they also spell out some of those vices by saying:
Global warming, air pollution. ozone depletion, desertification and water supply shortages, like the drug trade and social slavery, are all problems that demand organized regional or even global efforts. Whether anyone wants it or not.
While the most critical vice is in the factory education anti-system, it is well approached in Revolutionary Wealth. Another missing vice related to global warming first thought as a wicked problem is transformed into a virtue beyond the current trends identified by Kelly as follows: "New problems require thinking beyond the edges of the known and no problem needs new thinking more than the ever worsening global energy crisis.

That's the virtue we enabled back in the November 2013 post A complete and fully functional electricity restructuring proposal, where we mentioned a radical economic policy (anticipating what's said below) approach introduced four years earlier. Next is the summary of the earlier post;
A new approach to power energy policy design, based on system’s architecting heuristics, has led to an emerging simplified synthesis of the power industry regulatory policy. Instead of undergoing business as usual regulatory proceedings, the approach to the Electricity Without Price Controls Architecture Framework is poised to replace the Investor Owned Utilities Architecture Framework and its incremental extensions that have evolved by analytic patchwork as a extremely complex system.
We had redefined wicked first into systemic and later into anti-systemic problems. In short, the explanation we have given has been to identify those vices is by introducing them as anti-systemic problems. Below we become more precise by shifting from the EcoNoMy science to the EcoIsOurs.system profession that help introduce the economic lexicon that clarifies the meaning of globalization.

In the post Can #GlobalDebaut international call concentrate on an Ashoka like solid framework change? we suggest that the Dominican Republic is one of the best positioned countries to be the model for such an energy policy regulatory design approach. We add here that one of the main reason is the large prosuming penetration even for the poor that started in the 1990s that has remained as an independent activity under present price controls increasing the inefficiency of the whole sector, but
giving great opportunities to become interdependent.

That is where we will move beyond the idea of efficiency that no longer works on supply side economy of scale to the idea of synchronized efficiency (that the Tofflers suggested) on the demand side economy of scale institutional innovation available for a retail platform. This will make consumers become more than prosumers. After price controls are eliminated they will be able to become distributed producers that signal the importance of 'Small is Beautiful' in The Wealth of Globalization.

On chapter 13, "Thrust Reversers," the Tofflers say that: "None of this guarantees that long term benefits will flow from the macroeconomy to the microeconomy in which people actually live. And none of it guarantees democracy." The response we have is in the post Minimalists governments with fair global free deregulated markets must arrive soon, which becomes an integral part of this post. Those markets are being introduced as the Direct Democracy of Systemic Markets (#DD_SM in Twitter) As a matter of fact, it is that post where the Industrial Civilization 'Groupthink' concept emerged.

As the Tofflers suggested that the law is "the slowest of all our slow changing institutions," the minimalist government concept might be what facilitate a systemic constitution, whose best opportunity to start to emerge during 2017 may be for the European Union next summit. That would be a follow up to the one described in the "Fourth update. From actions that serve parts to actions that serve emerging Globaldebout whole at Bratislava Summit," of the post Why the Eurozone leaders must change their common sense first. To that we add what the Tofflers anticipated but went unheard and became even worst indeed as, for example, the Arab Spring, the 15 M and the Occupy Wall street was interpreted under The Wealth of Nations signal that is also pushing the disintegration of the EU and the USA:
The strategy broadly sketched in these pages is aimed not merely at transforming rural life but at radically reducing the rising, dangerous pressures placed on cities by tidal waves of peasants fleeting the unbearable -- pressures that could explode at any time.
Repeating what´s indirectly said in the initial text of the just mentiioned post, and shown in the tweet response to José Alfredo Méndez on the second update, according to Peter Drucker, his book “Management Challenges for the 21st Century”
… intentionally does not concern itself with ECONOMICS – even though the basic MANAGEMENT changes (e.g., the emergence of knowledge as the economy’s key resource) will certainly necessitate radically new economic theory and equally radically new economic policy.
At that time I said that "Although I don´t recall who it was who asked..." I found re-reading Alvin and Heidi Toffler's book Revolutionary Wealth, that "Yet too many economists, consciously or otherwise, cling to the belief that economics is analogous to physics." It adds elsewhere that "even today much in economics, including the legacies of Adam Smith..." supports the emergence of the change from The Wealth of Nations to The Wealth of Globalization.

From the traditional macroeconomics point of view, economic theory centers itself steady-state systems and radically new economic theory is about complex adaptive systems. That’s a shift from mechanical or Cartesian thinking to systemic or Peircian (after the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce) thinking.

One key difference between mechanical and systemic thinking is that between independence and interdependence. The assumption of independence is critical, for example, in the following Definition of Gross Domestic Product - GDP taken from Investopedia:
Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country's borders in a specific time period. Though GDP is usually calculated on an annual basis, it can be calculated on a quarterly basis as well. GDP includes all private and public consumption, government outlays, investments and exports minus imports that occur within a defined territory. Put simply, GDP is a broad measurement of a nation’s overall economic activity.
Now according to Eberhardt Rechting, who quoted himself in the book “The Art of Systems Architecting,”
System: a set of different elements so connected or related as to perform a unique function not performable by the elements alone.
One of the systems architecting heuristics says that “Relationships among the elements are what give systems their value added.” We suggest defining economic system as those where net value is added and economic anti-systems to those where net value is subtracted. That way the GDP definition must be questioned.

One of the key insights of Revolutionay Wealth is in Part 9 on Poverty, which needs to be upgraded on the critical difference between EcoNoMics and EcoIsOurs on the twin track second ad third wave approach that needs to be discontinued based on what's said below when we mention the book "Beyond the Limits." In that light, the key insight says:
What is needed is a strategy aimed at nothing less than the transformation of today's impoverished rural areas into enters of advanced, highly productive enterprise -- regios no longer dependent on the muscle power of emancipated, old-before-their-time parents but on the brain power of their children. 
To that we update what they say "No country can, we have repeated thruought that the wealth revolution involves more than computers and hardware -- more in fact, that economics. It is clearly social, institutional, cultural and political revolution as well.  In line with Peter Drucker suggestion, it is in fact more than political,which needs to make a radical shift from the Wealth of Nations to the Wealth of Globalization. Voters in France, Holland and Germany this year can benefit a lot from such a shift

As can be seen next, we give an answer to Geoffrey West assumption on the surprising math of cities that is based on GDP growth. Under the blog post Three Key Takeaways from the Annual Santa Fe Institute Symposium, written by Mark Thompson, CEO at Dialog Group, I posted the following comment:
We also thank you for sharing Mark.

We have been following John Hagel (on research done with his colleagues) for quite some time and their BIG SHIFT and have suggested recently that we are on a change from The Wealth of Nations of the industrial civilization of independent countries into The Wealth of Globalization of the systemic civilization (as we call it) of interdependent countries.

As a result of your post, I now understand that my personal top of mind feeling of cities having sub-lineal growth has found an answer that make us now seem wrong. I like the explanation of technological revolutions as a mean to avoid collapse that Geoffrey West explains in his TED video "The surprising math of cities and corporations."

To us the question remain, however, is whether his research has been restricted by the industrial civilization ‘Groupthink’ that supports such kind of city growth as a result of trying to emulate, for example, The American Way of Life which we understand is unsustainable. Here it may apply that “As SFI’s Brian Arthur has said, ‘Just because we can do a thing doesn’t mean we should.’”

In that regard, this might be the trigger we are waiting for to create the systemic civilizations in order to enable a sub-lineal sustainable Global Way of Life to emerge, in order to satisfy evidence found, for example, on the 1992 book “Beyond the Limits: confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future,” by Donella Meadows et al, on their sequel to their 20 years old book “The Limits to Growth.”
In return, Mark Thompson said:
Thank you Jose - please share whatever you think is the best primer on the systemic civilization of interdependence
Next is our response to his request, which later on motivated this update making his post the primer he ask for.
Thanks Mark Thompson.

The best primer is not on knowledge stocks yet, like books and articles by traditional economists and professionals that learn for the past, but in knowledge flows that are emerging on blog posts and tweets conversations that carry such flows that also include learning from the emergent future.

In that regard, please consider the following tweet conversation and their hashtags which lead to other tweet conversations on a specific topic, like #SystemicCivilization, #TheWealthOfGlobalization and #IndustrialCivilization Groupthink

https://twitter.com/gmh_upsa/status/814250658207531008 

Best regards!
Second update. To Paul Krugman: let's 'destroy the EcoNoMy' to help emerge the EcoIsOurs by embracing Great Capitalism. That's simply a way to let Schumpeter's creative destruction operate to make us all better off. While Paul Krugman's article Planet on the Ballot is in agreement with our argument that Bill Gates' 'Energy Miracle,' is not needed, we differ where he mechanically suggests that "As both a technical matter and an economic one, drastic reductions in emissions would, in fact, be quite easy to achieve. All it would take to push us across the line would be moderately pro-environment policies." The difference is that the ballot, as a consensus mechanism, isn't going to provide the required organic action oriented institutional innovation, under a scientific attitude, that's mentioned next.




In fact, we can select where Krugman says "True, Republicans still robotically repeat that any attempt to limit emissions would 'destroy the economy,' to reframe it as enabling the emergence of EcoIsOurs, which is beyond the scope of the ballot. With regard to the need to learn about the institutional innovation required, please consider the post To Fareed Zakaria, thanks! But, Yeats is still right on, which is to be considered as an integral part of this text.

We are only repeating here the introduction of the post that says "Fareed Zakaria has given us a very important contribution today under Fareed's Take, in his program GPS. His contribution can be read in his Washington post's article In the West, the political center holds — but barely." Here we add that we need to think of not just one center, but two. The current center today has become pro anti-systemic and it might remain pro anti-systemic even under Inclusive Capitalism, as discussed in "Eighth update. Global synthesis: great capitalism first, elections second," of.the post World Economic Forum Davos 2016: Will #OWS and #15M love The Industrialist’s Dilemma? 

As can be seen on the main entry of that last mentioned post, the second center is pro systemic, which went missing at COP21 in order to support Great Capitalism institutional innovation to zero carbon. I add now that the proposed agreement Laurent Fabius, French Foreign Minister, who chaired the summit and directed the negotiations said on the day before last  must be "balanced and annoy everyone. " In a tweet that day, we suggested that it shoud annoy the pro anti-system. This suggests that electoral candidates needed to fill the center need to embrace Great Capitalism.

The real problem on Krugman's suggestion can be inferred from what he says:
As a card-carrying economist, I am obliged to say that it would be best if these policies took the form of a comprehensive system like cap and trade or carbon taxes, which would provide incentives to reduce emissions all across the economy. But something like the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan, which would use flexible regulations imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency on major emitters, should be enough to get us a long way toward the goal.
This is how EcoIsOurs trumps EconNoMics. This time it is based on the must read article The Economy Isn’t A Machine. It’s Organic and Constantly Evolving.written by W. Brian Arthur, the recipient of the inaugural Lagrange Prize in Complexity Science and the Schumpeter Prize in Economics. The following paragraph of that article reveals the urgent need to change the mindset to get out of the current great depresion
The standard, equilibrium approach has been highly successful. It sees the economy as perfect, rational, and machine-like, and many economists – I’m certainly one – admire its power and elegance. But these qualities come at a price. By its very definition, equilibrium filters out exploration, creation, transitory phenomena: anything in the economy that takes adjustment – adaptation, innovation, structural change, history itself. These must be bypassed or dropped from the theory.
The new idea is that the system profession EcoIsOurs is organic and constantly evolving. This is another attempt to suggest shifting away from the independent underlying assumption of EcoNoMy (that emerge firts from Spanish Eco No Mía ) to the interdependent EcoIsOurs (to Eco Es Nuestra) as a great reminder of the need to create as sson as possible the systemic civilization.

First update, I posted the following comment under the article a Forbes article mentioned below, that says:


"No plea about inadequacy of our understanding of the decision-making processes can excuse us from estimating decision making criteria. To omit a decision point is to deny its presence – a mistake of far greater magnitude than any errors in our best estimate of the process." -- Jay W. Forester (2000) "Perspectives on the modelling process"  
Dear Steve Denning,  
Good afternoon! 
Please accept the following suggestion. Instead of Robert Piketty deserving a Nobel Prize in EcoNoMics, I understand that it is Jay W. Forrester, the father of System Dynamics, who deserve a Nobel Price, in the discipline of EcoIsOurs, in accordance with the blog post being distributed by the following tweet: 
@gmh_upsa - Replacing EcoNoMics with EcoIsOurs http://bit.ly/537GMH  @fredemamzade @adriantsn @JoseManuelLunaV http://bit.ly/529GMH  #EuropeIN 
Best regards, 
José Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio

“Good Artists Copy; Great Artists Steal” – Picasso
This is written as a complementary follow up to Why the Eurozone leaders must change their common sense first. I argue that the difference in meaning between EcoNoMics and EcoIsOurs is so great, that an effort to transition EcoNoMics itself to the new meaning given by EcoIsOurs will be very confusing indeed. In a way it explains the new common sense that the new European Commission needs to have its members and the Eurozone to enter a Golden Age as soon as possible, by letting wisdom govern, instead of money.

In order to describe both EcoNoMics and its replacement EcoIsOurs, I will mostly copy, with minor editing, the abstract, part of the introduction and part of the historical evolution of the text of the Plenary Address of the International System Dynamics Conference “Economic Theory for the New Millennium, given by Dr. Jay W. Forrester, the father of System Dynamics, on July 21, 2003, in the city of New York.

By stealing those words, but not revealing the remainder of the Plenary Address, I believe that instead of extracting huge value, as many business identified as vampires, for example, by Forbes, are doing today, I believe that I am actually adding great value to it, by marketing its great content, to help the world enter the Golden Age that Carlota Pérez predicted before that Address. However, any distortion or mistake introduced in this approximation, done here with an action oriented scientific attitude, is wide open to be perfected by making comments to this introductory note, which pretends to integrate the Good, the True and the Beautiful into an emerging integrated whole of the EcoIsOur world.

As a reason for its replacement, EcoNoMics has tried to be a science and in its effort has failed to answer major questions about real life behavior. It has failed to adequately explain what happens in the real world. The usual EcoNoMics literature presents it as a science, with EcoNoMist trying to emulate the hard sciences such as physics. Those attempts to force it into the mold of a science have not been satisfying. As a result of trying to pose as a science, its field has become substantially detached from real world behavior, and has tended toward a close theoretical discipline disconnected from the world it tries to explain.

EcoNoMics has drifted toward a conceptual structure that is narrow, is based on unrealistic assumptions, emphasizes equilibrium conditions, and is committed to mostly linear mathematical methods and statistical analysis of historical time-series data mostly confined to simple concepts. In essence they restrict themselves to learning from the past, which is a big mistake when new technological revolutions at the highest level arrive and even a worst mistake when a new civilization emerges. The failure of EcoNoMics to provide, for example, a persuasive explanation for the Great Depression of the 1930s, has left the world without protection to help us out the current Great Depression at the beginning of the 21st Century.

EcoIsOurs is to be a system profession, such as management, engineering and medicine, each of which is based on underlying sciences.  An EcoIsOurs systems profession would be based on underlying sciences such as psychology, decision-making, and nonlineal feedback dynamics. As a systems profession, it would then reach beyond its basic sciences to understand and redesign EcoIsOurs systems, which will concentrate in learning about the emergent future.

By closely observing the structures and policies in business and government, simulation models can be constructed to answer questions about business cycles, causes of major depressions, inflation, monetary policy, and the validity of descriptive economic theories. A system dynamics model, as a general theory of economic behavior, now endogenously generates business cycles, Kuznets cycles, the economic long wave, and growth. A model is a theory of the behavior that it generates. The economic model provides the theory, for the great depressions and how they can recur, for example, 50 to 70 years apart. Those models help reveal inconsistencies, weaknesses, errors, and mismatches between the theories and reality.


Publicado por --- No hay comentarios:

sábado, septiembre 20, 2014

Los referéndums in(ter)dependentistas están aquí para quedarse

Actualización: si cuando trata de retrinar o favorecer un trino, le dice Twitter que está Prohibido (Forbidden), simplemente vaya a la cuenta @gmh_upsa en twitter y fácilmente encontrará el trino que desea y a lo mejor otros más que les interese.

"La aversión a los referéndums de secesión ha venido para quedarse" es la síntesis clara y contundente de la noticia Después de Escocia, escrita por Javier Pérez Royo para ElPaís. Él agrega que “la democracia directa ha desaparecido como opción en el marco de la Unión Europea en este terreno de la integridad territorial de los Estados miembros.”


Sin embargo, aunque eso sea también verdad para la secesión basado en los aprendizajes del pasado, deja de ser un impedimento para todos y todas las habitantes del mundo en esta otra circunstancia. Dicho impedimento desaparece cuando se considera el aprendizaje del futuro emergente, con el que dicha democracia directa sigue latente.

Los referéndums siguen disponibles, especialmente para los que padecen de la desigual que ofrece el capitalismo salvaje, inicialmente en la Eurozona, que tiene en este momento las mejores condiciones para el éxito. Todos y todas tienen todavía una alternativa mucho mejor que la situación paupérrima en que muchos se encuentran, por ejemplo, en dicha Eurozona: los referéndums in(ter)dependentistas que están aquí para quedarse, como el que aparece a continuación:


En ese sentido, los invito a leer la nota que prefiera de las que aparecen en los dos trinos anteriores, eligiendo el lenguaje de su preferencia. Si luego de leerla, le parece un medio razonable para acabar con la desigualdad excesiva a que nos encontramos sometidos,  no dude en pulsar, como lo crea conveniente, los símbolos de Retrinar (Retweet), Favorito (Favorite) o ambos, que son los que siguen al símbolo Constestar (Reply). La versión en Inglés en mi hoja se lee cuando pongo el cursor encima de esos símbolos. Evidentemente, si tiene alguna observación o necesidad de aclaración, lo invito muy cortésmente a que usen su derecho de expresión por medio de Contestar.


Publicado por --- No hay comentarios:

viernes, septiembre 19, 2014

Un referéndum virtual: decir SI para reemplazar político mediocre con gran estadista

Esta es una traducción de la nota A virtual referendum: say YES to replace mediocre politician with great statesman.


Lo que sigue es apoyado principalmente por los mensajes en el blog de Grupo Millennium Hispaniola, que el 15 de marzo 2015, cumplirá 10 años. Reconociendo claramente las grandes diferencias entre él y yo, por favor considere este mensaje, como una emulación de Martin Lutero en la Reforma Protestante de la Iglesia Católica. Esta vez el cambio es de lo que se ha convertido en un capitalismo no civilizado a un capitalismo humanista emergente.

Si bien en los últimos meses, la concentración de las notas se ocupó principalmente de la situación local, que comenzó con una invitación a pasar de conversaciones pragmáticas tradicionales y generalizadas, centradas en el corto plazo, a las conversaciones más profundas sobre las posibilidades en el largo plazo, en el último mes se ha concentrado en las grandes oportunidades disponibles en el entorno global externo y atrayendo cetrinos con buenas intenciones sobre lo que ha surgido como una causa.

Este es el caso de la Eurozona en general y de los problemas de los países unitarios de algunos de sus miembros, como el Reino Unido, España, Italia, Bélgica, etc,, que mostraban la posibilidad de una avalancha de independencias, lo que sin duda estaba destinado a afectarnos más temprano que tarde. Refiriéndome principalmente a esas últimas notas, voy a tratar de sintetizar a continuación partes de los hallazgos disponibles, por ejemplo, también disponibles a través de twitter bajo @gmh_upsa.


Ahora parece que la avalancha de las independencias se ha detenido. Propongo que el origen de que status quo ganara el referéndum sobre la independencia de Escocia con un NO es la fuerte influencia de la corrupción sistémica global.

Esa corrupción es impulsada en lugares donde el dinero gobierna, lo que lleva como consecuencia a los políticos mediocres a ser jefes de Estado. La alternativa propuesta es tener un mundo de países interdependientes, donde la sabiduría gobierna. La información fundamental de esta propuesta es que ahora es posible utilizar una actitud científica orientada a la acción que produce un nuevo sentido común para desarrollar tales estadistas como jefes de estado. La mejor apuesta para que eso ocurra se encuentra todavía en la Eurozona.


Por esa razón, es justo decir que el mundo no ha perdido (ni ganado) mucho en el referéndum de Escocia, debido a que utilizaron el método no confiable del consenso, que sólo permite aprender del pasado, en una situación en la que el futuro es está cercano a una continuación del pasado. De hecho, no había evidencias, ni garantías, que esa corrupción sistémica se trataría de todos modos.

Bajo la administración de los políticos mediocres, que obtienen el poder al conseguir más dinero que sus adversarios, hacen compromisos que se traducen en importantes negocios de extracción de valor, bajo la corrupción sistémica. Eso a su vez es la principal fuente de la actual depresión EcoNóMica mundial, lo que alimenta la crisis sistémica social y ambiental que polariza la mayoría de lugares del mundo, donde la clase media está desapareciendo, los ricos se hacen más ricos y los pobres más pobres.

Como puede verse a continuación, los resultados de Twitter de esta semana favorece en:

1er lugar, 14 de septiembre, EcoSiNuestra como una poderosa idea cuya hora llegó;

Segundo lugar, 15 de septiembre, la independencia de Escocia como una mentira; y

3er lugar, 11 de septiembre, EcoSiNuestra como medio para disolver los problemas de los países unitarios,

Todos cerca por debajo de los 1,500 trinos.

De hecho, el trino del 1er lugar es una síntesis del trino del 3er lugar. Además, el trino del segundo lugar es el resultado de una aplicación del que está en el 1 º lugar. Parece que la corrupción sistémica no interfirió en los resultados, ya que con este proceso se trata de aprender desde el futuro emergente y el dinero no lo gobierna.


Sobre la base de la lección de Steve Jobs, que sólo se puede conectar los puntos mirando hacia atrás, los tres trinos se conectan entre sí en el tiempo. Como podemos recordar, hemos conectado con el punto de la primera arquitectura de nivel de la EcoSiNuestra del capitalismo humanista, desde el 1 º lugar de los resultados de Twitter de la semana pasada, destacándose con más de 2.000 trinos, que cuestionaba si EcoSiNuestra podría llevarnos a la sabiduría y la felicidad. Es fácil ver ahora que se trata de este tipo de resultados que impulsan el sugerido referéndum virtual.

Mirando hacia atrás, ahora puedo reflexionar sobre el punto de alcance inferior del segundo nivel de arquitectura que soporta el servicio eléctrico sobresaliente, que ya está disponible para cualquier estadista mundial a considerar. Estoy feliz de decir que está disponible para los empresarios e investigadores para desarrollar otros niveles inferiores de la arquitectura de la energía eléctrica.

Por último, pero ciertamente no menos importante, le sugiero que punto es también un ejemplo a emular para desarrollar otras arquitecturas de 2do nivel para ser consideradas por estadista para definir e introducir incentivos y desincentivos simples que conduzcan a servicios de valor añadido complejos e inteligentes. Mediante la introducción de la arquitectura EcoSiNuestra del 1er nivel, que aumenta el alcance más allá de las diferencias políticas, sociales, culturales, étnicas, religiosas o climáticas, el voto por el SÍ tiene la intención de sustituir a la EcoNoMía del capitalismo salvaje (ya no civilizado) del obsoleto status quo con el capitalismo con la EcoSiNuestra emergentes del capitalismo humanísta.




Jose A Vanderhorst S,
See your week in review.

These Tweets helped you make connections, got people excited, and started your friends talking.
Jose A Vanderhorst S
14.5K
Total
views
49
Retweets
17
Link
visits
YOUR MOST POPULAR TWEETS FOR THE WEEK OF 12 SEP:
THIS LINK GOT A LOT OF VISITS.
¿Será la EcoSiNuestra @Matterfilm @Cotizalia una idea poderosa a la que le llegó su tiempo? bit.ly/520GMH @adriantsn +q #EuropeIN
11:30 AM - 14 Sep 14
1,398 views2 favorites3 link visits4 Retweets
YOUR LINK GOT A LOT OF INTERACTION.
Scotland’s independence got around the world before its interdependence got its pants on bit.ly/522GMH @FareedZakaria +q#EuropeIN
01:17 PM - 15 Sep 14
1,436 views2 link visits6 Retweets
PEOPLE LOVED THIS LINK!
Disolvamos los problemas unitarios en Escocia y Cataluña con la EcoSiNuestra bit.ly/512GMH +q #EuropeIN
02:51 PM - 11 Sep 14
1,359 views2 link visits4 Retweets
 
Publicado por --- No hay comentarios:

A virtual referendum: say YES to replace mediocre politician with great statesman

La traducción de esta nota se puede leer en Un referéndum virtual: decir SI para reemplazar político mediocre con gran estadista.
What follows is mainly supported by posts on the Grupo Millennium Hispaniola Blog, which in March 15, 2015, will be 10 years old. Clearly recognizing the big differences between him and myself, please consider this post, as an emulation of Martin Luther’s Protestant Reformation of the Catholic Church. This time the change is from what has become uncivilized capitalism to an emergent humanistic capitalism.

While in recent months, the concentration of posts dealt mainly with the local situation, which started with an invitation to shift from traditional and widespread pragmatic conversations, centered in the short term, to deeper conversations about possibilities in the long term, in the last month it has concentrated in the great opportunities available in external global environment and attracting well meaning retweeters to what has emerged as a cause.

This is the case of the Eurozone in general and the unitary countries problems of some of its members, such as UK, Spain, Italy, Belgium, etc., was showing the possibility of an independence avalanche, which no doubt was bound to affect us sooner than later. Referring mainly to those recent posts, I will try to synthesize below parts of the findings, for example, also available through twitter under @gmh_upsa.

Now it seems that the independence avalanche has been stopped. I propose that the source of the status quo winning with a NO to Scotland independence referendum is the strong influence of global systemic corruption.

Such corruption is driven in places where money governs, leading as a result to mediocre politicians as head of state. The proposed alternative is to have a world of interdependent countries, where wisdom governs. The main fact of this proposal is that it is now possible to use an action oriented scientific attitude that produces a new common sense to develop such statesman as heads of state. The best bet for that happening is still in the Eurozone.

For that reason, it is fair to say that the world has not lost (nor gain) much in the Scottish referendum, because they used the non reliable method of consensus, which only enables learning from the past, in a situation where the future is not close to a continuation of the past. In fact, there was no evidence, nor guarantee, that such systemic corruption would be addressed anyway.

Under the administration of mediocre politicians, which get to power by getting more money than adversaries, they make compromises that result in significant value extracting businesses, under systemic corruption. That in turns is the main source of the current global EcoNoMic depression, which fuels the social and environmental systemic crisis that polarizing most places of the world, where the middle class is disappearing, the rich is getting richer and the poor poorer.

As can be seen below, Twitter’s results of this week favors in:

1st place, September 14, EcoIsOurs as a powerful idea whose time has come;

2nd place, September 15, Scotland independence as a lie; and

3rd place, September 11, EcoIsOurs as a means to dissolve unitary country problems, all close below 1,500 tweets.

In fact, the tweet in 1st place is a synthesis of the tweet of the 3rd place. In addition, the tweet in 2nd place is the result of an application of the one in 1st place. It seems that systemic corruption didn’t interfere in the results, as this process is about learning from the emergent future and money doesn’t govern it.

Based on Steve Jobs' lesson, that you can only connect the points by looking backwards, all three tweets are connected among themselves in time. As we can recall, we have connected to the point of the 1st level architecture of the EcoIsOurs humanistic capitalism, from the 1st place of Twitter’s results of last week, with an outstanding more than 2,000 tweets, that questioned if EcoIsOurs could take us to wisdom and happiness. It is easy to see that it is such results that now drive the suggested virtual referendum.

Looking backwards, I can now reflect on the lower scope point of the 2nd level architecture that supports Great electric service, which is already available for any world statesman to consider. I am happy to say that it is available for entrepreneurs and researchers to develop other lower level of the electric power architecture.

Last, but certainly not least, I suggest that point is also an example to emulate to develop other 2nd level architectures for statesman to consider in order to define and introduce simple incentives and disincentive that will lead to complex and intelligent value added services. By introducing the EcoIsOurs 1st level architecture, that increases the scope beyond any political, social, cultural, ethnic, religious or climatic differences, the YES vote intends to replace the obsolete status quo EcoNoMy savage (no longer civilized) capitalism with the emerging EcoIsOurs humanistic capitalism.


Jose A Vanderhorst S,
See your week in review.

These Tweets helped you make connections, got people excited, and started your friends talking.
Jose A Vanderhorst S
14.5K
Total
views
49
Retweets
17
Link
visits
YOUR MOST POPULAR TWEETS FOR THE WEEK OF 12 SEP:
THIS LINK GOT A LOT OF VISITS.
¿Será la EcoSiNuestra @Matterfilm @Cotizalia una idea poderosa a la que le llegó su tiempo? bit.ly/520GMH @adriantsn +q #EuropeIN
11:30 AM - 14 Sep 14
1,398 views2 favorites3 link visits4 Retweets
YOUR LINK GOT A LOT OF INTERACTION.
Scotland’s independence got around the world before its interdependence got its pants on bit.ly/522GMH @FareedZakaria +q#EuropeIN
01:17 PM - 15 Sep 14
1,436 views2 link visits6 Retweets
PEOPLE LOVED THIS LINK!
Disolvamos los problemas unitarios en Escocia y Cataluña con la EcoSiNuestra bit.ly/512GMH +q #EuropeIN
02:51 PM - 11 Sep 14
1,359 views2 link visits4 Retweets



 xxx
Publicado por --- No hay comentarios:
Suscribirse a: Entradas (Atom)