Mr. Maclay and other Gentlemen,
Thanks Dick for your comment. I like very much the qualifying insights to my humble posts. My response has two parts. In this one I address paragraphs 2, 3, and 4. In the second I will write about the separation fallacy of transmission and distribution and address paragraphs 5, and 6.
That Enron's mental model is different from Hogan's mental model can be traced to the following quote:
"The debate in California has changed remarkably over the past year or two. Discussion now focuses not on whether retail competition or direct access is possible, but on how to make it happen. The three California investor-owned utilities affected by the commission's decision convened an industry working group, called the Western Power Exchange (Wepex) to address the issues related to implementing the new competitive retail market. Its responsibility has included making three filings to FERC by the end of April 1996, seekiing:
• Approval to create a new institution - the ISO - that will provide comparable open access for wholesale and retail use of the transmission system, plus approval to transfer the control operation and control over a large share of utility transmission facilities to the ISO.
• Approval to create the PX to run a California spot market for power, plus approval for the utilities to sell into the PX at market based prices.
• A determination of the dividing line between transmission, over which the FERC has jurisdiction, and distribution, whose regulation is expected to be left to the states [1]."
The first and second bullets were opposed by Bill Hogan, as the following quote says: "For a different perspective on whether the system operator and the power exchange need to be separated, see "Avoiding the Separation Fallacy," by William Hogan, Electricity Journal, December 1995, pp. 26/37 [2]"
The last bullet is common to Enron's and Hogan's mental models. The origin can be traced to Bill Hogan, as can be seen from my post "Retail Access is Easy" above. As can be seen, Bill Hogan is the most influential person of deregulation.
© José Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio, PhD. 2006.
Interdepedent Consultant on Electricity
Dominican Republic
[1] Barbara R. Barkovich & Dianne V. Hawk, "Charting a new course in California," IEEE Spectrum, July 1996, pp. 28-29.
[2] Ibid, pp 31.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario