lunes, septiembre 22, 2008

Hoy Digital: Síndrome del Fracaso Perenne

Extra - La respuesta al Editorial: El Síndrome del Fracaso Perenne Global

21 Septiembre 2008, 10:29 PM

Todo parece indicar que el mercado eléctrico rinde sus mejores rentas cuando está en crisis. Si fuera de otro modo, no habría manera de explicar por qué ese servicio marcha de fracaso en fracaso, perjudicando la economía general del país. El modelo energético actual, resultante de la apertura de la empresa pública al capital privado, no ha logrado el objetivo de dotar al país de un servicio energético eficiente y confiable.

Entre la gran evasión de pago por parte de los usuarios, especialmente los más ricos, hasta las triquiñuelas y costos ocultos del sistema, han hecho del mercado eléctrico algo infuncional en términos de servicios, pero aparentemente muy rentable para quienes explotan el negocio.

El país ha tenido que soportar todo tipo de abusos, desde apagones financieros hasta cobro indebido de energía no servida. La deficiencia del servicio eléctrico ha sido probablemente el mayor ahuyentador de inversiones locales y extranjeras y ha dado el tiro de gracia a miles de pequeños negocios, fábricas, talleres y proyectos de autogestión. No ha habido manera de que el mercado energético haya satisfecho ni siquiera medianamente las necesidades energéticas del país. Sin embargo, no se tiene cuenta de que quienes explotan el negocio de la electricidad tengan la intención de abandonarlo por pérdidas. Parecería que su principal y única virtud es ser rentable mientras se mantiene en crisis.

Un país de “operativos”

En nuestro país es frecuente que se hagan “operativos”, sean médicos, de limpieza, de vacunación, contra la delincuencia. Y con la misma irreverencia con que hemos convertido “operativo” en sinónimo de “operación”, el resultado de estos actos viene a ser más mediático y exhibicionista que efectivo en los objetivos. De suerte que la acumulación injustificable de basura es un insumo para justificar el “operativo” mediático y figurero.

Por ejemplo, en Santo Domingo Este hay acumulación de basura y, sin duda, obedece a fallas en la recogida. A esta molesta situación seguirá un “operativo” para retirar los desperdicios, sin dejar atrás el recurso mediático. Probablemente funcionemos mejor como país cuando abandonemos la vocación por los “operativos” y nos decidamos a efectuar verdaderas operaciones. La basura se produce a diario y, por lo mismo, la recogida debe ser una operación diaria, no un “operativo” ocasional.

Versión original del Editorial de Hoy Digital

Electricity for the Digital Era, Part 2

It is very clear that we need electricity for the digital era, where retail competition is about business model innovations that will develop the resources of the demand side and enable demand elasticity. To transform local utilities from regulation or deregulation to EWPC we need to enable as soon as possible a transition to a complete and fully functional market on the digital era, under an EWPC Energy Policy Act.

This is an update of the highly recommended articles' summary EWPC Blog's First Year Anniversary: Electricity for the Digital Era.

First posted on the GMH Blog on September 22nd, 2008.

The update is about two comments by Don Giegler and my responses.

Comment #1

EXPERT ANALYSIS SHOWS PROPOSED NEW PUDS COMPETING FOR BPA POWER WILL LENGTHEN PHASE-IN TIME, SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASING ELECTRIC RATES

An independent analysis performed by Hardy Energy Consulting and released today by Puget Sound Energy (PSE) finds that competing proposed new public utility districts (NPUDs) in Skagit, Island and Jefferson counties will face a lengthened phase-in process to access low-cost power from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) if they succeed in getting approved by Washington state voters in November and meet other requirements. - (YellowBrix) --> http://www.energycentral.com/global/news_text.cfm?id=11030598

# Posted By Don Giegler 9/11/08 12:59 PM

Response #1

Who cares that BPA's has rules to give away cheap federal power. In the mean time, those district that want to take away from Puget Sound Energy (PSE) a local distribution system to sell themselves monopoly power under the obsolete price controls business model will need to purchase expensive (or maybe market priced) power for several years in a wholesale market without retail demand elasticity and thus subject to higher than necessary wholesale market prices.

So who cares, except you, that "the system" favors PSE. It is very clear that is not about electricity for the digital era at all, where retail competition is about business model innovations that will develop the resources of the demand side and enable demand elasticity.

Those who care, in those districts (and elsewhere in the USA), need to transform PSE (and their local utility) to EWPC to enable asap a transition to a complete and fully functional market on the digital era.

# Posted By Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio 9/14/08 6:05 PM

Comment #2


CITIZEN POWER CALLS ON STATE GOVERNMENT TO DETERMINE WHY ELECTRICITYDEREGULATION HAS FAILED AND TO DEVELOP LONG-TERM CORRECTIONS TOAVOID UNWARRANTED RATE INCREASES

In a letter to key legislators, regional energy advocacyorganization Citizen Power has requested the Pennsylvania GeneralAssembly to appropriate funds for an independent study of theElectric Choice program. - (YellowBrix)--> http://www.energycentral.com/global/news_text.cfm?id=11085527

# Posted By Don Giegler 9/19/08 5:03 AM

Response #2

Don,

Thank you for the lead. I am available as an independent and systemic consultant to advise Governor Rendell (or any other governor with deregulation issues) and/or the Pennsylvania (or the corresponding state) General Assembly on the study that should be funded as soon as possible.

Since EWPC is electricity for the digital era, which deregulation is not, Citizen Power (or any other energy advocacy organization of other state), needs to place close attention to the EWPC article "An Overdue Debate: Customers' Price Controls (please hit the link http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2008/5/5/An-Overdue-Debate-Customers-Price-Controls )," whose summary states: "The regulation vs. deregulation discussion was about the wrong question. An undiscussed issue during the debate, price control is the key to a properly framed debate. As utilities keep wining rate cases to the regulators, customers are now facing a very large risk of increasing rates as unprepared regulators are part of a flawed system that push them to make incredible bets on Intelligent Utility Enterprise and Smart Grid investments."

It is also very clear that Citizen Power Calls on State Government is not about electricity for the digital era at all, where retail competition is about business model innovations that will develop the resources of the demand side and enable demand elasticity.

Just as in the case of PSE, those who care, in Pennsylvania (and elsewhere in the USA), need to shift from deregulation to EWPC to enable ASAP a transition to a complete and fully functional market on the digital era.

# Posted By Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio 9/19/08 3:13 PM