En su artículo oportuno, comentado y posteado en "Building a Better Utility: de Keynes a Edison," Judith Warrick se hace la pregunta: "¿entonces, si el futuro es la generación distribuida, porqué no vamos hacia allá lo más pronto posible? La realidad dominicana dista un tanto de la de los Estados Unidos: la generación distribuida es ya nuestra realidad. Nuestra generación distribuida ha sido el resultado de la mano invisible. Lo único que falta es desarrollar el proyecto de Respuesta de la Demanda para integrarla al sistema interconectado, cuya estrategia fue sugerida en abril del 2005 al Presidente Fernández.
Esto es parte de lo que Judith Warrick dijo sobre "Distributed Generation for the Digital Economy:"
Distributed generation (DG) is the future. It has to be. DG can provide support to the transmission system, so the costs of DG shouldn't be compared with central-station plant but evaluated based on how they change reactive power needs, voltage, and stability on the transmission lines . DG also is the future in a digital economy. Central station power plants cannot supply the reliability and power quality needed for a digital society. Most customer interruptions are not due to failures in central-station plant. They're in the transmission and distribution (T&D), and mostly the D side of the house. So siting plant closer to (or actually at) the load source will increase power quality and reliability. Imagine what would happen to your load forecasts if the majority of your customer growth is siphoned off by DG installed for stability and reliability, not cost .
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario