In fact, we can repeat, what was said in Spanish, that there was a Babel Tower displayed at the luncheon. That is why reports from the different sources had differing interpretations of what happened. I suggest that anyone trying to learn of the advantages Central America has to read the Book "Keeping the Lights On," which the InterAmerican Development Bank help published in 2003. They have problems for which we have the turn around solution.
The report on DR1 is the following:
Even thought the subject is worn out, the business community of Herrera wanted to hear "from the horse's mouth" whatever solutions the government has for the current electric crisis. Clave Digital details what went on when invited the Superintendent of Electricity, Francisco Mendez was invited to talk to the Herrera industrialists group at a luncheon held at Casa de Espana, a social club setting.
There, the industrialists opened their get-together to the Superintendent, who came dressed in sincerity to give a message that was pessimistic, but true, to his hosts. In a calm voice, Mendez told his audience that the Dominican electricity situation can never be compared to the Central American electricity situation. Why? Because Central America is an integrated region with plenty of hydraulic resources and a perfect interconnection that is working towards even greater efficiency with the help of Colombia and Mexico.
As a colophon tacked onto his sincere conversation, Mendez let his hosts know that "it is a dream" to think that the country can solve its energy problems by building hydroelectric dams. He said, "We don't have water, we only have a few little rivers," as he pointed out the difference between Costa Rica and the other Central American block nations who have abundant water resources.
The Dominican Republic, soon to be part of the DR-CAFTA agreement, does not have this possibility, as Mendez pointed out, and even with the capitalization of the energy sector which has produced a generating capacity above demand, this is of little help because of the "real mess" that the distribution represents.
After the comparison made my the chief electric supervisor, the hosts changed their faces and digested the message in all of its explicit and implicit meaning. Mendez was telling them that unfortunately, the DR would never be competitive against the Central American block of countries. This was the message that Francisco Mendez brought to the table at a time when the DR is headed towards the DR-CAFTA trade agreement and a tax reform that will be passed this year, "come Hades or high water."
Even though Mendez was talking about something that everyone knew, the audience was markedly disgusted and Ernesto Vilalta, the president of the Herrera Industrial Association could not hide his discomfort when spoke out. In spite of everything, he thanked Mendez for coming to the get together the association has been holding for a long time.
Most of the industrialists present were well versed in the "damned triangle" of major problems affecting the sector: electricity, unfair taxing and poor access to credit.
They listened patiently as Mendez let loose with expressions such as "the government has a coherent and rational plan," "there is no such thing as a free lunch, and somebody has to pay for this crisis," and we can only cover just so much."
Of course Mendez talked about the problems inherited from the former administration; the counter-reform, the Madrid contracts extended for 15 years that ruined the process of the reform and capitalization of the electric companies as well as the financial disaster of 2003.
When the time came for debating, Luis Arthur, a member of the association's board, practically demanded the speaker to present the government's plans for a solution to the crisis. Arthur said," You are being the Devil's advocate. You know that there is a serous problem but you have not given us concrete plans. As a result, we are stuck without any defenses, while US$63 million are lost every month to overpriced electricity and as a consequence of the bad deals that were made." As Arthur talked, the Superintendent ate a green salad with Parmesan cheese and later he set his teeth into a chicken fillet with cream sauce and a side of broccoli, carrots and potatoes. Arthur said, "I am going to keep talking while you eat." One of the audience said that this might provoke some indigestion for the Superintendent. Arthur pointed out that in spite of the crisis, the industrialists have to compete and they are between a rock and a hard place. Once more he asked, "What are your plans?! What are you doing?" Arthur then questioned the Government plan to install two used plants that will use coal as fuel and that have demanded seven years of profits up front.
Mendez had no answers for his audience. As reported in the Diario Libre the government has paid millions of dollars to the generating companies to avoid what were called "financial blackouts." When Mendez said that the government planned to renegotiate the Madrid Accord, things apparently got heated. Antonio Isa Conde called the Madrid Accord the "greatest crime ever committed against the electric sector, and the sad part is that they will have 15 years worth of high electricity rates as they laugh all the way to the bank." He pointed out that the renegotiation of this agreement represents half of the energy solution. As the conversation became more heated, questions were asked as to why the government did not enforce the General Electricity Law, or how long was the government is going to allow the distributors inefficiencies?
Miguel Ceara Hatton asked Mendez how much would energy cost is the distributors were to collect 90% of the energy distributed. After a somewhat convoluted set of calculations, Mendez told his audience: 11? of a dollar. Then Ricardo Valdez Albizu suggested that the Superintendent's office allow more non-regulated clients to produce their own electricity. He pointed out that in the case of his own company they were producing electricity at just 9? of a dollar. At the end, there was only one conclusion: There is no solution to the energy crisis.
In the report, one may conclude that there were two sides. Mendez talk and the others. But, by reading more intensely, one could see the incoherence of the many issues that are behind the sentences. That is why we conclude that there was a Babel Tower at the luncheon. However, GMH believes that there is a solution and the "real mess," which is not limited to the distribution. The "real mess" has to do with the rules which prevent a robust electric power sector from developing. There is a need to manage risks at retail and wholesale, with Demand Response. There is a need for the development of retailers as the intermediary between generators and customers, leaving the distributor as a transporter and the government as a regulator. That solution can then be exported to the other Latin American countries.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario