Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio | Mar 21, 2011
Last 20 plays. Continuation of the 60 plays on the IEEE Spectrum Smart Grid 2025 Game of Part I and Part II
4373
|
3/18/2011 14:32
|
4295
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
Me too!
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
4008
|
3/18/2011 12:30
|
3988
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
The redundant gas turbine wastes a lot of gas waiting for a problem. Demand response does not waste that much.
|
7
|
2
|
0
|
4016
|
3/18/2011 12:34
|
4008
|
capt_stargazer
|
365
|
Investigation
|
So multiply the number of users who can draw from the system by creating smarter demand, not supply?
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
4079
|
3/18/2011 12:57
|
4016
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
Exactly! Notice also that customers have different preferences in the Technology Adoption Life Cycle. They wait for a Killer application
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3821
|
3/18/2011 10:56
|
3816
|
ligtvoet
|
387
|
Adaptation
|
But generally with 1 hour or 15 minute intervals. These could be shortened, thus reducing costs of imbalance.
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
3951
|
3/18/2011 12:06
|
3821
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Adaptation
|
That's right! But, integrating varying solar and wind generation makes it more difficult.
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1138
|
3/17/2011 18:13
|
140
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Antagonism
|
That is the reason why the current Smart Grid \...implementation and integration process ...is fragmented and uneven\""
|
13
|
4
|
0
|
1224
|
3/17/2011 18:27
|
1138
|
Smarts
|
481
|
Antagonism
|
There are about 3000 utilites in the US each is 'doing its own thing' when it comes adopting smart technologies. Guaranteed fragmentation...
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
2799
|
3/18/2011 0:43
|
1224
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Antagonism
|
It does not matter that there are not 3,000, but 10,000 utilities worldwide. No new. Utilities have been adopting new technologies before.
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2805
|
3/18/2011 0:46
|
1224
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Antagonism
|
Develop the necessary electric power policy incentivesstructures to avoid fragmentation, using systems architecture, like #EWPC-AF
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3768
|
3/18/2011 10:26
|
1138
|
ligtvoet
|
387
|
Antagonism
|
Surely you don't blame academics for that?
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3659
|
3/18/2011 9:18
|
140
|
ligtvoet
|
387
|
Adaptation
|
My colleagues get more work.
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
453
|
3/17/2011 17:00
|
116
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
There was a system architecting effort between 2002 and 2004 that led to the system-within-system approach, that only considered technology
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
148
|
3/17/2011 16:26
|
123
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
Are you asking for a paradigm shift away from business as usual?
|
47
|
5
|
0
|
195
|
3/17/2011 16:32
|
148
|
AnuKowli
|
364
|
Antagonism
|
No. I am merely stating engineering goal and economic objectives of the Smart Grid should complement each other and get reflected in policy.
|
23
|
4
|
0
|
3844
|
3/18/2011 11:08
|
195
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
\... technology is the easy part to change. The difficult aspects are social, organizational and cultural.\" Donald Norman"
|
11
|
3
|
0
|
4282
|
3/18/2011 14:06
|
3844
|
AnuKowli
|
364
|
Investigation
|
How do we achieve changes in social, cultural and organizational aspects to move towards a smarter grid? What are the benefits?
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
4323
|
3/18/2011 14:18
|
4282
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
Eliminate restriction imposed Areas beyond system architecting “changes to the overall business and regulatory structure of the industry.�
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
4333
|
3/18/2011 14:21
|
4282
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Investigation
|
That set the difference between a technological and socio-technical architecting process. The benefit: avoiding the very costly dead end.
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
813
|
3/17/2011 17:37
|
148
|
EWPC-AF_Creator
|
55
|
Momentum
|
A paradigm shift is needed to consider not only the engineering goal and economic objectives. There is a need to include socio cultural too
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
yyy
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario